Funding

  • By John Bailey
    November 22, 2010
  • By John Bailey
    November 18, 2010

    NGA announced a new STEM Advisory Committee to help Governors develop comprehensive STEM agendas.  Press release is below.  

     

    11/12/2010

    NGA Center Announces STEM Advisory Committee

    Science, Technology, Engineering and Math Experts to Aid Governors in Building STEM Agendas in States

    Contact: Erin Munley, 202-624-7787
    Office of Communications

    WASHINGTON–The National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) today announced that it has formed a Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) Advisory Committee to inform its work in this area and help the 29 new governors, as well as incumbents, develop comprehensive STEM agendas in their states.

    “The increasingly globalized economy requires workers with strong science, technology, engineering and math skills,” said John Thomasian, director of the NGA Center. “This Committee is intended to provide the perspectives of a variety of stakeholders to governors and states as they work to establish and grow STEM education programs that can contribute to economic competitiveness.”

    Advisory Committee members, who will serve two-year terms, represent expertise across education, policy, business and STEM content areas and include:

    • Mark Anderson, state lead ARRA coordinator, Hawaii Department of Budget & Finance

    • Susan Bodary, principal, Education First Consulting

    • Carlos Contreras, U.S. education director, Intel

    • Emily DeRocco, president, Manufacturers Institute, National Association of Manufacturers

    • Susan Elrod, executive director, Project Kaleidoscope, Association of American Colleges & Universities

    • Gary Hoachlander, president, ConnectEd: The California Center for College and Career

    • Karen Klinzing, deputy commissioner of education, Minnesota Department of Education

    • Rebecca Lucore, manager, Community Affairs, and executive director, Bayer USA Foundation Bayer Corporation

    • Jan Morrison, executive director, Teaching Institute for Excellence in STEM

    • Charles Nash, Ph.D., vice chancellor for academic and student affairs, The University of Alabama System

    • Stephen L. Pruitt, Ph.D., vice president for content, Research and Development, Achieve

    • Anthony “Bud” Rock, chief executive officer, Association of Science-Technology Centers

    • Linda Rosen, chief executive officer, Change the Equation

    • Richard Rosen, vice president for education and philanthropy and executive director, Ohio STEM Learning Network, Battelle

    • Cary Sneider, Ph.D., associate research professor, Portland State University Center for Science Education

    • Yvonne Spicer, Ed.D., vice president, National Center for Technological Literacy, Museum of Science Boston

    • Richard (Rick) Stephens, senior vice president, Human Resources and Administration, The Boeing Company

    • Uri Treisman, Ph.D., professor of mathematics and public affairs, executive director, Charles A. Dana Center The University of Texas at Austin

    • Helen Quinn, Ph.D., chair, Board on Science Education, Center for Education, National Research Council

    The committee will guide the expansion of the NGA Center STEM agenda to include both K-12 and higher education; provide a series of recommendations for building and advancing comprehensive STEM education agendas;and inform the development of a national STEM meeting the NGA Center will host in the fall of 2011.

    For more information about NGA Center STEM education efforts, visit www.nga.org/center/edu.

    ###

    Founded in 1908, the National Governors Association (NGA) is the collective voice of the nation’s governors and one of Washington, D.C.’s, most respected public policy organizations. Its members are the governors of the 50 states, three territories and two commonwealths. NGA provides governors and their senior staff members with services that range from representing states on Capitol Hill and before the Administration on key federal issues to developing and implementing innovative solutions to public policy challenges through the NGA Center for Best Practices. For more information, visit www.nga.org.


      Read more

  • By John Bailey
    November 18, 2010

    The Florida Virtual School and Pearson have teamed up to offer Pearson Virtual Learning powered by FLVS  Schools will have access to not just online courses, but a customized credit recovery program called "Learning Recovery", AP courses, and professional development.

    This new partnership is well timed to take advantage of a number of macro trends that are driving online learning growth. Thirteen of the governors that won their 2010 elections had online learning in their education platforms. Half the states are facing deep budget gaps for the foreseeable future and the federal conversation has shifted from "stimulus" to "austerity" leading policymakers to look for ways to do more with less.  This environment could actually spur more growth in online learning given the cost effectiveness to scale professional development and college-ready courses such as AP.  Transition to Common Core could also spark new demand as schools look to online courses to fill in course caps.  

    Press releases below. 

     

     

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Florida Legislative Leaders Announce Worldwide Online Education Business Expansion

    Florida Virtual School and Pearson to Accelerate Online Learning Opportunities

    Orlando, FL (November 17, 2010) – Florida Senate President Mike Haridopolos and House Speaker Dean Cannonannounced today an alliance between Florida Virtual School (FLVS) and Pearson Education, Inc., a global leader in education, technology and services. Under the agreement, Pearson will offer schools outside the state of Florida and across the globe more than 100 FLVS courses, including core courses in all disciplines, Advanced Placement, Career and Technology courses, and electives for grades 6-12. The courses will be aligned to the new Common Core State Standards. FLVS will continue to offer online courses within Florida. As the state’s premier public virtual school, this relationship will only serve to strengthen the products and services to the students and families in the state of Florida.

    Senator Haridopolis commented, ―Over a decade ago, Florida’s state leaders had the vision to invest in Florida Virtual School as the country’s first statewide public online school. Since that time, FLVS has built a program that has garnered national acclaim for our state. This agreement will help pave the way to expand and share innovative learning opportunities for 21st Century students

    ―When it comes to education, Florida has been a leader among its peers, and this agreement with Pearson and FLVS will revolutionize learning opportunities not only in Florida but on a global scale,‖ said State Representative, Cannon. ―Florida Virtual School’s online learning has improved the quality of instruction, while increasing productivity and lowering costs, ultimately reducing the burden on taxpayers as well as employing thousands of Floridians.‖

    Impressive data from an independent research study confirms that students learning through Florida Virtual School dramatically increased their performance, including a high student course completion rate with passing grades, and improved scores on state tests. These results have proven to be a cost-effective model for delivering instruction.

    FLVS President & CEO Julie Young added, "The opportunity to partner with Pearson is a monumental step forward in accomplishing our long-standing goals and mission at FLVS — to provide every child an engaging, personal, and unique learning experience."

    Pearson’s CEO for Schools Peter Cohen, said, "Our agreement with Florida Virtual School is one more step in recognizing the cosmic effect of technology in revolutionizing education. Digital learning allows teachers to customize education for each individual student. Through this alliance, we will expand Pearson’s existing virtual offerings and move forward with our commitment to transform education through technology and set each child on the path to success in school and in life."

    The agreement will make it possible for Florida’s schools, FLVS, and national and global school customers to provide a variety of new or advanced courses that they might otherwise not have the resources to offer. These new virtual courses will allow educators to customize offerings for students’

    individual interests and abilities. The courses provide online learning opportunities for students who live in rural areas, who are homebound, or who may need an online summer school option. The online school is also a valuable resource for those who are homeschooling their children.

    The Pearson and Florida Virtual School agreement provides the opportunity to reverse the school dropout rate by providing learning recovery courses for students who have to make up coursework in order to graduate. These courses are available at any time of the year and provide students with pre-tests, instruction, discussion-based assessments and post-tests.

    # # #

    About Florida Virtual School (FLVS)

    Florida Virtual School (FLVS) is an established leader in developing and providing virtual K-12 education solutions to students all over Florida, the US and the world. A nationally recognized eLearning model and recipient of numerous awards, FLVS was founded in 1997 and was the country’s first, state-wide internet based public high school. Today, FLVS serves full-time and part-time students in grades K-12 and provides a variety of custom solutions for schools and districts to meet student needs. FLVS aims to deliver a high quality, technology-based education that provides the skills and knowledge students need for success in the 21st Century. Its vision is to transform education and create possibilities for learners worldwide. For more information, go to www.flvs.net

    About Pearson

    As the world’s leading education company and leader in learning, content, technology, assessment and education services, Pearson is committed to improving the lives of people everywhere. We do this by providing support to build a stronger education system and offer personalized opportunities for students of all ages to learn at their own pace, in their own way. Our success is founded in partnering with education stakeholders to deliver innovative products, technologies and services that respond to challenges to education and help improve student achievement. Pearson is making unprecedented levels of investment in new models for education and supporting key elements of the reform agenda: Common Core standards, college and career readiness, teacher effectiveness, school improvement, and custom solutions for schools and colleges. Visit www.pearson.com.

    Media Contacts:

    Florida Virtual School – Star Kraschinsky, skraschinsky@flvs.net - 407.513.3456

    Pearson – Kate Miller, kate.miller@pearson.com – 800.745.8489

     

     


     

     

    Pearson and Florida Virtual School Announce Agreement

    Private/Public Alliance to Accelerate Reach of Online Learning Opportunities

    Orlando, FL and New York, NY, November 17, 2010 -- A private/public alliance between Pearson and Florida Virtual School (FLVS) will accelerate virtual learning opportunities around the world for millions of school students who have grown up smack in the middle of the technology revolution.

    The new Pearson Virtual Learning powered by Florida Virtual School will offer schools throughout the US and across the globe more than 100 FLVS courses in all subject areas for grades 6-12, including advanced placement and career and technology courses. The virtual courses will be aligned to the new Common Core state standards.

    Pearson CEO for Schools Peter Cohen said, "Our agreement with Florida Virtual School is one more step in recognizing the cosmic effect of technology in revolutionizing education. Digital learning allows teachers to customize education for each individual student. Through this alliance, we will expand Pearson's existing virtual offerings and move forward with our commitment to transform education through technology and set each child on the path to success in school and in life."

    FLVS President & CEO Julie Young said, "The opportunity to partner with Pearson is a monumental step forward in accomplishing our long-standing goals and mission at FLVS -- to provide every child an engaging, personal, and unique learning experience." Young noted that FLVS will retain its existing operation as a Florida public school.

    Impressive data from an independent research study confirms that students learning through Florida Virtual School dramatically increased their performance, including a high student completion rate with passing grades, and improved scores on state tests. These results have proven to be a cost-effective model for delivering instruction.

    Cohen said the new agreement will make it possible for schools to provide a variety of new or advanced courses that they might otherwise not have the resources to offer. These new virtual courses will allow educators to customize offerings for students' individual interests and abilities. The courses provide online learning opportunities for students who live in rural areas, who are homebound, or who may need an online summer school option. The online school is also a valuable resource for those who are homeschooling their children.

    The Pearson and Florida Virtual School agreement provides the opportunity to reverse the school dropout rate by providing learning recovery credits for students who have to make up coursework in order to graduate. These courses are available at any time of the year and provide students with pre-tests, instruction, discussion-based assessments and post-tests.

    In addition to full course availability, schools have the option to purchase courses for their own teachers to use or modify, and the courses will integrate with their existing learning management systems. Comprehensive services in customized teacher professional development, student management and systems integration services are available through Pearson Virtual Learning powered by Florida Virtual School. For more information, visit http://www.pearsonschool.com/virtuallearning.

    About Pearson

    As the world's leading education company and leader in learning, content, technology, assessment and education services, Pearson is committed to improving the lives of people everywhere. We do this by providing support to build a stronger education system and offer personalized opportunities for students of all ages to learn at their own pace, in their own way. Our success is founded in partnering with education stakeholders to deliver innovative products, technologies and services that respond to challenges to education and help improve student achievement. Pearson is making unprecedented levels of investment in new models for education and supporting key elements of the reform agenda: Common Core standards, college and career readiness, teacher effectiveness, school improvement, and custom solutions for schools and colleges. Visit http://www.pearson.com.

    About Florida Virtual School (FLVS)

    Florida Virtual School (FLVS) is an established leader in developing and providing virtual K-12 education solutions to students all over Florida, the US and the world. A nationally recognized eLearning model and recipient of numerous awards, FLVS was founded in 1997 and was the country's first, state-wide internet based public high school. Today, FLVS serves full-time and part-time students in grades K-12 and provides a variety of custom solutions for schools and districts to meet student needs. FLVS aims to deliver a high quality, technology-based education that provides the skills and knowledge students need for success in the 21st Century. Its vision is to transform education and create possibilities for learners worldwide. For more information, go to http://www.flvs.net.

    Contact

    Pearson - Kate Miller, kate.miller@pearson.com - 800.745.8489
    Florida Virtual School - Star Kraschinsky, skraschinsky@flvs.net - 407.513.3456

     

     

    Full disclosure, we work with FLVS and other online providers.  

      Read more

  • By John Bailey
    November 17, 2010

    Congratulations to Paul Freedman, CEO of Altius, who closed an $18.6 million funding round.  Press release below.  

    The timing couldn't be better.

    • Sloan's recent report showed huge growth in online enrollments - jumping 21% last year compared to just 2% growth in overall higher ed.  

    • The recession has displaced millions of workers, many of whom are headed back to college to reskill for better jobs. The flexibility of online learning opens new higher ed opportunities for nontraditional students and many workers who need to balance jobs and families with their studies.  

    • Online learning is the only cost effective, scalable solution for the U.S. to meet the President's goal of having the highest proportion of college graduates in the world by 2020.  Students will need more pathways to securing two and four year degrees with many doing some combination of online and in-classroom work.  Others will uses these flexible approaches to take college credit in high-school or take some higher-education level courses before transferring to a four-year degree program.

    • Increased focused on outcomes and improving college completionproductivity, and retention rates will create new demand for robust online solutions that not only deliver courses, but help adapt to student needs, flag instructors for which students need additional help, and help ensure the student is on the path for completing programs and degrees.  

    • The always-on, mobile generation wants more online learning options.  You can't grow up with the Internet, smart phones, iPads, YouTube instructional videos, and social online environments and not have different expectations for education.  The institutions that will be the most competitive for this generation of students are the ones that begin developing offerings now.  

    Paul has developed a great model that taps into all of these trends by forming partnerships with institutions to increase the number of two-year online associate's degree students who transfer into into bachelor's degree programs.  Participation students have options through the system's articulation agreements with more than 65 four-year universities.

    Ben has some additional thoughts in an earlier post.  If you want more, follow Paul over at his Twitter feed.

     

     

     

    Altius Education Raises $18.6 Million in Series B Funding to Fuel Growth

    Charles River Ventures Joins Existing Backers Spark Capital and Maveron To Strengthen Company's Position in Volatile Higher Education Sector

    SAN FRANCISCO, Nov. 17, 2010 /PRNewswire/ -- Altius Education, Inc., a San Francisco-based provider of online higher education, today announced that it has closed an $18.6 million Series B funding round led by Charles River Ventures (CRV). CRV joins Maveron and Spark Capital in supporting Altius' innovative approach to meeting some of the nation's most pressing higher education and workforce training needs.

    In 2007, Altius launched Ivy Bridge College, a joint venture with Tiffin University, to address the growing gap in post-secondary education – increasing numbers of non-traditional students seeking a pathway to a traditional four-year degree. Today, Ivy Bridge offers 1,500 learners a two-year online associate's degree and seamless admittance into bachelor's degree programs through articulation agreements with more than 65 four-year universities.

    "Despite fluctuations in the market, and an uncertain regulatory environment facing the for-profit, online higher education sector, we were eager to invest in Altius because of the company's objective success to-date," said Saar Gur, partner at CRV. "Altius Education CEO Paul Freedman and his team have built a strong business model that is attracting the attention of traditional higher education institutions due to the importance of the market it is serving, and its high persistence and graduation rates."

    Ivy Bridge's student success-focused model has emerged at a time when both the federal government and individual students are increasingly focused on student outcomes. Retention and graduation rates are more than double the industry average, driven by the unparalleled student mentoring and support that Ivy Bridge provides to its students. From application to graduation, each student is assigned a success coach to guide them academically and professionally to reach their individual goals.

    Recently, Altius extended Ivy Bridge College's reach by partnering with Tiffin University in Ohio, City University in Seattle, andConcordia University in Chicago to create co-branded four-year programs for students. Altius intends to establish local partners in every state through a network it calls The Altius University System.  

    "CRV is an ideal financial partner to help us expand the Altius University System," said Altius CEO Paul Freedman. "With expertise in growing early-stage companies, Saar Gur and the Charles River team will provide invaluable insight and offers us a tremendous competitive advantage."

    "Altius is proving to be an innovator in designing and building quality online programs that are democratizing access to post-secondary education. We were eager to continue supporting Altius' growth," continued Maveron partner Amy Errett.

    "We are extremely proud of our investment in Altius Education," added Spark Capital partner Alex Finkelstein. "It's impressive when a company can provide such explosive growth while simultaneously providing a great social value. It is clear that Altius is doing just that."

    In 2009, Altius Education closed Series A funding with $8 million, co-led by Maveron and Spark Capital. Altius will use the new capital to continue the growth of its programs and expand the number of partnerships in its network.

    About Altius Education

    Altius Education, Inc., partners with traditional universities to create an ecosystem designed to expand access to the traditional high-education. The heart of Altius' portfolio is Ivy Bridge College, a joint venture with Tiffin University, offering online associate's degree programs with direct access to more than 65 accredited four-year institutions. Altius has also partnered with a network of regional universities to create co-branded, four-year programs. For more information, visit www.altiused.com.

    About Charles River Ventures

    Founded in 1970, Charles River Ventures is one of the nation's oldest and most successful early-stage venture capital firms with approximately $2.1 billion under management. CRV is dedicated to helping exceptional entrepreneurs turn their ideas into the next category leaders in high growth technology and media sectors. Over the past 10 years, CRV funds have been ranked among the industry's top performers. CRV has offices in Boston, MA and Menlo Park, CA. For more information, visitwww.crv.com.

    About Maveron

    Maveron is a leading venture capital firm founded by Dan Levitan and Howard Schultz. Maveron's mission is to partner with entrepreneurs in the creation of extraordinary consumer-based companies in order to generate outstanding financial returns. Current representative Maveron investments include fast-growing consumer companies, such as Potbelly Sandwich Works, Pinkberry and Livemocha, Allconnect and zulily. Monetized investments include eBay, Capella Education Company, Shutterfly, Cranium (acquired by Hasbro), Qsent (acquired by TransUnion), Good Technology (acquired by Motorola) and lucy activewear (acquired by VF Corporation). Based in Seattle, Washington, and San Francisco, Maveron has approximately $750 millionunder management and 23 active portfolio companies nationwide. For more information, visit www.maveron.com.

    About Spark Capital

    Spark Capital is a venture capital firm based in Boston, Massachusetts, with investments focused on the conflux of the media, entertainment and technology industries. Over the last decade, the Spark team has been instrumental in the development of new markets and market leaders such as Akamai Technologies, Qtera, Aether Systems, Novatel Wireless, Twitter, 5Min, Altius Education, AdMeld, Verivue and Tumblr. With deep experience and $980 million under management, Spark Capital provides world-class entrepreneurs and revolutionary companies with the resources to succeed in today's marketplace. For more information, visit www.sparkcapital.com.

    SOURCE Altius Education, Inc.

    Back to top

    RELATED LINKS
    http://www.altiused.com

      Read more

  • By John Bailey
    November 17, 2010

    The Federal Communications Commission announced that the guidelines for the $10 million E-Rate Deployed Ubiquitously (EDU) 2011 Pilot Program.  Details are available over at the FCC website and also below.

    The EDU program allows E-Rate eligible schools and libraries to pilot the use of E-Rate funding for off-school/library grounds wireless access for mobile learning devices. The grant guidelines suggest that they're looking for projects that are already somewhat established.   that have already planned or are operating wireless projects.

    The FCC says that the goal of this pilot is to “investigate the merits and challenges of wireless off-premises connectivity services for mobile learning devices and to help the Commission determine whether and how these services should ultimately be eligible for E-Rate support.”  The recent changes to improve and streamline the E-rate are welcomed and long overdue, but there still seems to be a strange timidity in terms of modernizing the program to recognize the realities of today's technology environment.  Mary Meeker's report yesterday painted a much different picture of mobile technology.  Her question to CEOs wasn't, "investigate the merits" but rather "you need to be prepared for this now."  Hopefully, we'll see the EDU pilot lead to broader reforms of the E-rate to make it friendlier to online and mobile learning.  

     

     

    WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU ANNOUNCES APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR THE E-RATE DEPLOYED UBIQUITOUSLY (EDU) 2011 PILOT PROGRAM

    WC Docket No. 10-222

    Application Deadline:  December 17, 2010

    On September 28, 2010, the Commission released the Sixth Report and Order in the above-captioned proceeding. The order upgraded and modernized the schools and libraries universal service support program (also known as the E-rate program) to encourage the expansion of fast, affordable Internet access in schools and libraries across the country.[1]  As part of the Sixth Report and Order, the Commission launched a pilot program − EDU2011 – to investigate the merits and challenges of wireless off-premises connectivity services for mobile learning devices, and to help the Commission determine whether and how those services should ultimately be eligible for E-rate support.[2]  As part of this pilot program, the Commission authorized up to $10 million for funding year 2011 to support a small number of innovative, interactive off-premise wireless connectivity projects for schools and libraries.  The Commission anticipates that EDU2011 funding will be provided only to wireless projects that have already been planned (but may be awaiting funding) or are currently underway, to enable the Commission to evaluate how best to use E-rate support for successful wireless projects.  Support under this program will not be provided for the portable devices or equipment, but rather for the connectivity services.

    To be considered for the EDU2011 funding, applicants must address the application requirements listed below and submit their applications to the Commission on or before December 17, 2010.  Applications that do not address all the requirements or are filed after the deadline date will not be considered for the EDU2011 funding.

    EDU2011 Application Requirements:

    Applicant Wireless Program. On the date the Sixth Report and Order was adopted (September 23, 2010) eligible applicants already should have implemented or begun the process of implementing[3] a program to provide off-premise connectivity to students or library patrons through the use of portable wireless devices. 

    Application Length.  Applications shall be no longer than 20 pages including any exhibits.  Any relevant technology planning documents (see number 8, below), however, do not count toward the 20 page limit.  The Commission will not review any application that is greater than 20 pages in length.

    Required Information (all applicants).  The application must contain the following information for all applicants:  

    (1)         a full description of the current or planned Applicant Wireless Program, including but not limited to:

    1. the nature of the Applicant Wireless Program, including the extent to which the use of connectivity is interactive and utilizes the Internet,
    2. how long the Applicant Wireless Program  has been in operation and the mobile wireless device(s) being used,
    3. a description of any technical issues associated with implementing the Applicant Wireless Program, including an analysis of any problems with the availability of wireless access to students or patrons off the school or library premises and how those issues are being or will be addressed by the school or library,
    4. what training has been or will be provided to teachers, librarians, students or parents to implement the Applicant Wireless Program, and
    5. the extent to which the Applicant Wireless Program is integrated with federal, Tribal, state, regional or local governmental or non-profit initiatives to achieve educational or community access outcomes;

    (2)         the poverty level based on the percentage of students eligible for a free or reduced-price lunch under the national school lunch program (NSLP) or a federally approved alternative mechanism, and the current discount rate of the school or library;

    (3)         the financial need of the school or library, including any additional budgetary hardships, notwithstanding the school or library’s current discount rate;

    (4)         all costs, including those eligible for E-rate support and those not eligible for E-rate support, associated with implementing the Applicant Wireless Program, including but not limited to costs for equipment such as e-readers or laptops, access and connection charges, teacher training, librarian training, or student/parent training;

    (5)         the committed school or library resources available to implement the entire Applicant Wireless Program, including whether those funds are from the school or library’s general budget or from an outside funding source;

    (6)         the effect EDU2011 support for off-premise connectivity is likely to have upon the school’s or library’s projects;

    (7)         an analysis of the cost-effectiveness of the current or planned Applicant Wireless Program as compared to the use of other types of technology that would also meet the Program’s objectives; 

    (8)         any relevant technology planning documents and, if applicable, a statement of long-term objectives for the Program;

    (9)         a description of the specific measures taken, or that will be taken, to ensure compliance with the Children’s Internet Protection Act and measures to protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; and

    (10)     a description of internal policies and enforcement procedures governing acceptable use of the wireless devices used in the Program off the school or library’s premises.

    Required Information (libraries only).  The applications filed by libraries also must contain the following information:

    (1)   the location of the library;

    (2)   the name of the library applicant, along with a complete list of the individual libraries that will be served, including their billed entity numbers;

    (3)   a description of the library or library system, such as the specific community(ies) served and the number of branches or locations; and

    (4)   a description of how the program facilitates access in the community to needed services, such as job applications, governmental services, job training, online learning opportunities, and any other community services.

    Required Information (schools only).  The applications filed by schools also must contain the following information:

    (1)   the location of the school;

    (2)   the name of the school applicant, along with a complete list of the individual schools that will be served, including their billed entity numbers;

    (3)   a description of the school district or school, including the type of school, such as private, public, charter, or other special type of school;

    (4)   a description of the Program’s curriculum objectives, the grade levels included, and the number of students and teachers involved and/or being served as part of the program; and

    (5)   a summary of any data collected by the school on Program outcomes and achievement of Program objectives.

    Applicants must also apply for E-rate funding by following the regular E-rate program rules.  Specifically, in addition to the information requested above, eligible schools and libraries must submit an FCC Form 471 application to USAC during the regular application window.  We direct applicants to file an FCC Form 471 application specifically for the wireless connectivity services to be used off-premises as part of the program for which the applicant is seeking funding and file a separate FCC Form 471 for any services to be used on premises. Applicants should type “EDU2011” in the form identifier field of the FCC Form 471 application for the wireless connectivity services to be used off-premises.  Applicants should also list all of the schools and/or libraries that will be receiving the off-site wireless connectivity services in Block 4 of the FCC Form 471 application.  Because potential applicants will most likely already be using portable wireless devices in their school or library, applicants may have an established relationship with a service provider.  Therefore, the Commission has waived, to the extent necessary, the applicable sections of the Commission’s E-rate competitive bidding rules for those EDU2011 pilot program applicants that have already entered into legally binding agreements with service providers for off-premises connectivity for portable wireless devices.[4]

    The Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) will notify applicants and USAC when it has selected applicants to participate in the EDU2011 program.  Selected applicants will receive the allotted connectivity support and will not be required to cost-allocate the dollar amount of support for the time that portable devices are not on school or library premises.[5]  Applicants will receive funds sufficient to cover the amount of connectivity expenses eligible for E-rate funding based on their discount; they will still be required to pay their non-discount share.  After the one-year trial period, participants will be required to submit a report to the Bureau describing in detail any data collected as a result of the program and a narrative describing lessons learned from the program, which may assist other schools and libraries desiring to adopt similar programs in the future.

     

    EDU2011 Application Filing Procedures:

     

    Eligible schools and libraries may submit their applications either (1) by using the Commission’s Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or (2) by filing paper copies.  All applications submitted as part of the EDU2011 pilot program must refer to WC Docket No. 10-222. 

    • Paper Filers:  Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail.  All filings must be addressed to the Commission’s Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
    • All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission’s Secretary must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 12th St., SW, Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554.  The filing hours are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.   All hand deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners.  Any envelopes must be disposed of before entering the building. 
    • Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD  20743.
    • U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington DC  20554.

    Eligible schools and libraries may also send a courtesy copy of their filing via email to EDU2011pilot@fcc.gov or by mail to Regina Brown, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-A360, Washington, D.C. 20554 or Rebekah Bina, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B521, Washington, D.C. 20554. 

    For further information, please contact Regina Brown or Rebekah Bina, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484.

    - FCC -



    [1] See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, A National Broadband Plan For Our Future, CC Docket No. 02-6, GN Docket No. 09-51, Sixth Report and Order, FCC 10-175 (rel. Sept. 28, 2010) (Schools and Libraries Sixth Report and Order).

    [2] Id. at paras. 44-50.

    [3] For example, a school or library that had developed a detailed, specific plan for such a project but had not started implementation due to lack of funding would be eligible. 

    [4] Schools and Libraries Sixth Report and Order at para. 47; 47 C.F.R. § 54.504 (2009).  

    [5] This funding only relates to support for wireless, off-premises connectivity service, and not the purchase of devices or equipment, such as mobile broadband cards, smartphones, or digital textbooks.  Schools and Libraries Sixth Report and Order at paras. 46, 50.  

      Read more

  • By John Bailey
    November 16, 2010

    The New York Times has a fun, interactive page where you can try to close near and long term budget gaps.  We're given  1,345 squares, each representing a billion dollars.  Checking on various fiscal policy options fills in more or less of the squares providing a good visual of the savings. 

    To help, the NYT has collected 16 ideas from various policy wonks and economists.  Donald Marron has some ideas for cleaning up the tax code.  Chris Edwards from CATO proposes eliminating all Federal K12 education funding and the mandates that come with the dollars.  For other ideas, check out the initial thoughts from the President's National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform (pdf).

     

    NYTDeficitGame

      Read more

  • By John Bailey
    November 16, 2010

    Another great deck by Mary Meeker and Scott Devitt from Morgan Stanley hitting on some top Internet trends.  Some interesting points:

    • Mobile is heating up faster than earlier forecasts, catching many providers somewhat flatfooted.  iPhone/iPad adoption is faster than AOL or Netscape. 

    • Interesting how in the 90s the debate was around "online" versus "bricks-and-mortar."  The debate shifted then shifted to how physical providers would leverage online strengths (e.g. order online and pickup in a store).  Meeker points out that the mobile/social ecosystem is enhancing that even more with location-based services and discounts (e.g. FourSquare's promotion offering for businesses).  Others, like Target, are experimenting with augmented reality apps that blend online, print, and in store assets.  

    • Best slide is 32 - mobile connectivity drivers new ways to do lots of things faster / better / cheaper.  Two drivers of this trend are instant on devices and longer battery life.

    One trend not entirely addressed in the deck is the blurring of computers and phones.  The iPad is a good example - I've found it has easily replaced 80% of my home computing needs (video and photo editing the two main exceptions).  And I've noticed that I use it more for apps and connecting to the Internet then my BlackBerry.  My sense is that these lines will blur even more with future updates that will add VOIP and video chatting capabilities.  

    The presentation is geared toward Internet Execs but still good reading for other solution providers.  Big implications for those thinking about new ways of delivering government services, including education.  States and schools need to be thinking about cost effective strategies for delivering college ready courses, transitioning to common core, and delivering mobile learning opportunities, not just online learning opportunities.

     

    click to read full deck.

      Read more

  • By Ben Wallerstein
    November 16, 2010
  • By John Bailey
    November 12, 2010

    lection results and what they mean for policy areas such as education.  

    ProspectsOn Wednesday, Andy Rotherham and I hosted our fourth Education Insider webinar, this one focused on the midterm elections.  Alyson Klein over at Politics K-12 covered some of the top line findings as did Rick Hess. Some results that caught my attention:

    • State Elections:  For those involved in education, the real political shakeup didn't happen in Congress but at the state level.  Republicans picked up the governor’s office in 12 states (including key 2012 Presidential swing states) and now control more legislative seats than at any other point since 1928. Federal policies like the Common Assessments and national efforts such as Common Core, might face some additional scrutiny and challenges in this new political landscape.

    • Voter Frustration:  The exit polls revealed that seven out of 10 voters were dissatisfied with the way federal government is working.  Other polling shows that voters think the stimulus programs have helped big banks and institutions but did little to help low- and middle-income families.  That helps to explain why voters want to see some spending restraint.  They are not going to support increased federal spending when they believe the government isn’t working and isn't pursuing policies that benefit them.

    • Insiders Are Pessimistic About ESEA Reauthorization:  54% expect reauthorization will take place after 2012 with 46% believing it will take place in 2013 after the next Presidential election.  

    • But There Is Hope:   The President highlighted education as one of the areas he could work with the Republicans.  The White House has sent stronger signals over the last week that they want to work on ESEA reauthorization then they have all of last year.  Insiders also pointed out that incoming Speaker Boehner is passionate about education reform, having worked with Sen. Kennedy on NCLB. If both sides want to show voters that they can work together on something, education could be as good of an issue as any. Insiders said that if we don't see a bill by August, then we're most likely looking at a reauthorization after January 2013.  

    • Funding:  We have likely see the high-water mark for education funding.  More than 45 states have 2011 budget shortfalls totaling $125 billion with additional shortfalls projected for next fiscal year as well.  State revenues are decreasing while Medicaid enrollment is increasing making matters even worse.  At the Federal level, we're likely to see a pivot from stimulus to austerity measures.  Eric Cantor has called for holding reverting the budget back to FY 2008 levels (pre-bailout/stimulus).  The President attacked this saying it would result in a 20% cut in education funding, but then his Fiscal Responsibility Commission issued a similar recommendation of holding the budget to FY 2010 levels with 1% reductions over three years.  Our Insiders were split 50/50 if this will mean cuts for Federal education dollars or just level funding. 

    Much more in our 47 page report found here.  

    We also spoke with investors and analysts about the elections as part of Stifel, Nicolaus & Company hosted event.  There were a lot of questions around what the elections mean for the higher education community, particularly the pending gainful employment regulations.  We happened to have asked Insiders this very question and found that more than 82% believe it is likely that the Republicans will try to block the implementation of Gainful Employment. what surprised me was the number of times Insiders referenced Gainful Employment in other areas of our survey.  Meaning how the Administration handles this controversial regulations has implications for the politics around ESEA reauthorization.  

    We also just finished a summary of the education platforms of the 37 governors that won their election last week. Will be available soon...

    Finally, our colleagues at Dutko Grayling State and Local hosted an event discussing the election with Nathan Daschle, Democratic Governors Association; Phil Cox, Republican Governors Association, and Josh Kraushaar, National Journal.  You can watch it online at C-SPAN.  

     

    cspan

      Read more

  • By John Bailey
    November 10, 2010
    • First look at the 2012 battleground map.  GOP Governor gains in key swing states Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania change the dynamics.  

    • CCAP's 25 Ways to Reduce the Costs of College, funded through a Lumina grant.  Includes recommendations for online learning and AP courses.

    • Innocentive - new open platform for crowdsourcing ideas and solutions.  They describe themselves as "the global innovation marketplace where creative minds solve some of the world's most important problems for cash awards up to $1 million. Commercial, governmental and humanitarian organizations engage with InnoCentive to solve problems that can impact humankind in areas ranging from the environment to medical advancements."

    • The President's National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform released their draft recommendations today (pdf).  Couple of interesting points- principle 6 calls for continued investments in "education, infrastructure, and high-value R&D."  They also set a spending target of 21% of GDP or lower, way below the current level of around 30%.  Looks like a debate about what levels to hold spending to.  Cantor suggests 2008 and the Commission calls for 2010. 

    • 84% of Students Covered by Common Core.

      Read more

Clients with Monitor Report subscriptions can login here.