NCLB

  • By David DeSchryver
    April 2, 2013

    The NCLB accountability model is just that – a model.  The student academic growth model is just that – a model. The statistician George Box said it artfully, “All models are wrong, some models are useful.” Read more

  • By David DeSchryver
    October 17, 2012

    What happened to parental involvement? The idea has been incubating. In 2002, NCLB got ahead of itself. The premise was right, but the data and the tools were not yet ready. That has changed. Read more

  • By John Bailey
    October 19, 2011
  • By David DeSchryver
    October 9, 2011

    When President Johnson first passed the ESEA in 1965, Title I was clearly about providing specific supplemental services for students in high poverty schools. That, however, changed with each reauthorization. Read more

  • By David DeSchryver
    September 23, 2011

    Today, the United States Department of Education (ED) will release the long-awaited waiver guidance for the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). What are the key issues to monitor? Read more

  • By John Bailey
    August 5, 2011
  • By David DeSchryver
    June 29, 2011

    This is getting out of hand. Secretary Duncan made the pronouncement that if Congress would not reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “we will be prepared with a process that will enable schools to move ahead with reform in the fall.” With that, the gates swung open and states began to devise proposals — and why not? The states just spent months coming up with Race to the Top plans; may as well get some mileage out of them. Read more

  • By John Bailey
    May 3, 2011
  • May 6, 2011 - 3:30pm

    A flurry of activity by the Administration and Congress raised expectations reauthorizing ESEA in 2011. The President touched on education reform during the State of the Union and also made March "education month" during which he and the Secretary held a number of events to build support for reauthorization. Read more

  • By David DeSchryver
    February 13, 2011

    The School Improvement Grant (SIG) is a critically important program. It is, debatably, the lynchpin for the Obama administration’s ESEA reauthorization strategy.

    If the Administration had its way, it would no longer require the current seven-year cascade of interventions that No Child Left Behind (NCLB) currently requires. Instead, the federally required interventions would be limited only to those schools that the state has identified as its persistently lowest-achieving schools (PLAS), and that limited role would be quite muscular to assure that significant changes occur in these schools. The administration would rather be more focused and effective with their funding. Read more

Clients with Monitor Report subscriptions can login here.